I needed a bit of a laugh...

My apologies in advance, if you don't find it equally entertaining. You have to admit that the priest has some great dance moves and pay particular attention to one of the altar boys! Most interesting is that this is Roman Catholic...I'm sure HR has some better memories from St. Greg's.

See it, in all its glory, HERE.
(thanks Bob!)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Thanks, that was vastly entertaining, as well as slightly disturbing. Please don't anyone ever let the Assemblies of God folks find out about robes and candles...

-- Anonymous sockmonk
fdj said…
hehehe...I predicted this might be your response Seraphim...and frankly I agree. But it brings up a question: Why DON'T we Orthodox dance the Little Entrance or Great Entrance? Why DON'T we clap our hands? Why DON'T we use drums and guitars? Is it, perhaps more than a preference? I think I have in my own mind some answers to this, but would like to hear from you all first. Hey, why not present the video to your own Parish priest and ask :"Why not Father?"

Was it St. Xenia who danced during the Liturgy on a least one occassion? Yes, David danced, I believe however that it was something extraordinary, no? In other words, the everyday liturgical worship of Israel didn't have dancing, did it? I mean, maybe the High Priest danced while in the Holy of Holies...but I kinda doubt it.

As I said, I know that this is NOTHING in the grand scheme of litrugical dancing that one could find, but that little altar boys' rythmic wiggle at the end just cracked me up and perhaps that in and of itself is a good reason why we don't try such a thing in the OC (at least for the sake of my unillumined sake.)
fdj said…
ahem...try again...
(at least for the sake of my unillumined SELF.)
fdj said…
hehehe...I am guessing the skipping priest would be less likely to define his own movements as such..more like speed walking. Having only ever been to one Parish for Pascha services, is rose petal tossing universal? Generally speaking, I think chanting (byzantine, Russian or whatever) is woefully inadequate for dancing - even the upbeat ones like "Let God Arise!" (oh I dunno, sitting here eating luch I can sorta do a little toe tapping as I think of the tune.)

I don't think we are getting at the heart of why we don't feel free to dance the Little Entrance. Yes, the awe of God coupled with deep and profound reverence - but I have in my mind the image of a slow, steady burning vigil lamp...as opposed to one burning out of control.
Monica said…
But what about the fact that the Gospel book is an icon of Christ Himself. If you were so privileged to handle the Infant Christ (I've been thinking about this a lot with the present feast) would you twirl him about like any other baby trying to excite a giggle or a coo? Or would you handle him with awe like Simeon and allow the Holy Spirit to inspire a hymn in your heart? Shouldn't we have a similar reverence before every icon of our Lord?

The Gospel book is an icon that we bow before and kiss. Even the Gnostic heretics venerated it. There is a certain dignity in a solemn procession. I have to say that IMO that dignity was missing in the video.

Monica
Alana said…
My take on it is this: When our priest does the Little Entrance with the Gospel book, my focus is on the Gospel Book, and on God, the Word, of which it is an icon. There is awe and reverence and joy.

In this video, my focus was on the dancing, the movement, and on the emotion of the moment.

It reminded me a great deal of the type of church I went to in my high school days, where the worship was a well orchestrated emotional crescendo, complete with dancing and clapping...the only difference here was the vestmets and the procession. Viewing it was a weird combo of two worlds that have never before collided for me. I found it to be distracting. I, for one, NEED to be able to set my own emotions aside when worshiping God.
fdj said…
Well you know the whole "taking offense" thing is a real whipping boy for me lately. People take offense too easily...whereas I would refrain from ever ever ever ever judging the sincerity of the people involved, why can we not criticize the practice without criticizing the practitioners?

That being said, we must find a criticism that goes beyond "preference." For "preference" is potentially dangerous.

Elitism is profoundly scary...but is it perhaps too easily and erroneously heaped upon people who are simply being honestly and sincerely critical? A judgement in and of itself?

What of the term sobriety in our worship? I'm pushing for more and clearer arguments. Anyone recall when I wrote a brief article regarding why we Orthodox do what we do? In it, I try and make the case that as a sort of therapy, EVERYTHING in Orthodoxy is intended to heal and grow us - not entertain us or appeal to our supposed needs, but rather make us aware of our real needs.

Here's the link:
http://home.comcast.net/~irenaios/Library/landmarks.htm

Any thoughts? I'm not sure there is anything inherently or neccesairly WRONG with what they are doing (I dunno, there might be), but it just isn't the kind of medicine we are prescribed.
Anonymous said…
Alright, here's the thing. We don't need the priest to perform for us, or entertain us, or call attention to himself. We just need him to pray for us and lead us in prayer. That's why the vestments and the servers' stichars are supposed to more or less match the altar cloths and so on: so they'll blend in. The readers out in the nave aren't among so many icons and cloths, so they get stagehand black. Not meant to be seen or stared at, just heard. Innovation is very dangerous, and is accompanied by a host of temptations towards vanity, towards improvisation and pride, and so on. "Is my procession better than that other priest's? Is attendance up because of my performance?" A presider should never have to wonder such things or be overly tempted by such things, but only remember that he's just doing what he is supposed to do as best he can, as an unprofitable servant.

None of this is intended as arrogance or elitism; God forbid. On the contrary, we just don't trust ourselves enough to start down that path.

We also don't need to all feel the same emotion at the same time. We can pray the prayers joyfully, or sorrowfully, or with any other feeling, and it's ok. This kind of freedom doesn't exist when a songleader tries to get the whole assembly to feel the same wash of emotion. Trust me, I've been there.

-- sockmonk
Anonymous said…
Well, it seems I shall be the lone voice on this thread that finds this video offensive. (Note I write the VIDEO is offensive NOT you James or other people who have posted comments.)

First of all to use the Gospel procession (of all things) as an advertisment for your architectural company is (IMHO) the height of distaste. Secondly, is this supposed to be the dedication and consecration of the church as a place of worship of our our HOLY God?! If that is so, then (again IMHO) it ought to be a time of solemnity not frivolity. Dancing around with the Gospel of our God in the priest's hands...well, words escape me.

This smacks too close to the evangelical hilarity that is overtaking churches today. I left that for the seriousness of worship that is found in the Orthodox church. If my priest were to skip up the aisle during any part of the entrances or Liturgy, I'm not sure what I would do. Definitely cry. I think it is disrespectful to the Lord our God who sits on the Throne. I know David danced before our Lord, but was it in worship? I don't think so.

Forgive me if I offend any with my words. Just my cheap .02.
Anonymous said…
I've just re-read the comments and must retrack my statement about being the "lone" voice of opposite opinion. Please accept my apologies.
joel said…
I must admit, this out cry over this dancing is a bit overwhelming. As I journey, and try to understand where God has me, I would most definitely say that there is a bit of elitism on some of the previous comments. I think i recall correctly that worship is a matter of lifestyle that can incorporate many attributes. Therefore, is dancing not one. Sure, the bible references many who found themselves prostrate in the presence of the Lord, but i find the reverence of His word demanding the same reaction a mockery. A self-righteous action of piety. Nevertheless, none of us know the heart of the priest and what the Spirit had deemed appropriate for him, therefore, i save judgment. I may not respond in that manner, yet i am not him, or Him.
Munkee said…
Very good opinions, i just want weigh in on the Samuel 6:14 passage "And David danced before the LORD with all his might; and David was girded with a linen ephod". I would commend all who haven't read that passage in the last month to go back and read it. The passage is very clear so i won't bore you with my lame and unnecessary exegesis. I DO NOT think any of us should be going out and pushing for liturgical reform, But i would say that David was in fact worshipping God in one of the most intense and beautiful ways. Read the whole passage it is beautiful and it resonates with something deep inside me. Sorry for the tangent.

Peace out,
Anonymous said…
The only sensible title for the video is "That Seventies Show".
Too many memories of folk masses from the Carter years...Bad hair, bad skin (mine) and really, really bad liturgical auto-eroticism.
fdj said…
Is there not an individualistic elitism that says: "I should be able to worship any darn way I please?"

I guess I don't see that demand as being any different than "You ought to do it this way." Both can by tyranical.

But as for the Orthodox, Joel, I encourage you to read the article I posted. We do not view worship in a way that you may be familiar with. Such that this comment: "worship is a matter of lifestyle" will in most cases rub an Orthodox cat's fur the wrong way.

I think to a large degree seeing something done like this (that has a very real base semblace to what we do: the "Little Entrance") has a tendency to really take us aback a little. More than anything, I think it points out the difference of perspectives that transcends matters of lifestyle or preference.

That being said, I think Sockmonk makes some very good points about having to "one up" the previous years service or about trying to guide the emotions of those present. I am actually planning to say something more about this as the thought recently occurred to me as I recalled some of the old youth group planning sessions that used to torture me: "What are we going to do this week???"

Philippa...no apology needed, I didn't even realize this was also being used as an ad. That is sad. Truly mixing the profane and the sacred.

Aaron...wasn't it about that same time that David was doing (or about to do) his dance that God struck somebody dead for touching the ark...despite the fact that he was just trying to keep it from falling? Wow, talk about tangents.
Munkee said…
Gosh I'd rather be having a beer with you James discussing this, we'd make much better ground, mainly because of my clumsiness with the written word and that whole gift of being concise and actually getting my point across. Anyway, i've just so often been turned off by the idea of dancing or as some Ethiopian Christians do Jumping in worship that the thought struck me to actually read the passage about David's little dance. It moved me and so i tossed it out. As far as Uzzah is concerned, that passage really blows my mind especially in contrast with Holy King David's dance of might (with his ephod on). For whatever it's worth.
Huw Richardson said…
I have to say that is the Gospel Procession from St Gregs nearly exactly - there are some decidedly icky additions and substractions, but it pretty much seems they stole it from SGN. I'd be interested to know if their priest had been to the ecumenical Liturgical conference we had, the one where the RC priest got suspended because of concelebrating with Protestants.
fdj said…
Seraphim, if I were to "dance unto the Lord with all my might" I can guarentee that you would have a very difficult time focusing or seeing anything other than Chris Farley as a Chippendale's dancer.

I don't think anyone is saying that dancing cannot be worship...but...you say "clearly not the Little Entrance" and that is precisely what I want to be clear about.

I think we are getting there.

Is there something we learn from the quiet solemnity of the Little Entrance? We often talk about how we live in such a noisy and distraction filled world...I wonder if the overall sobriety, length, and ceremonial pomp of the Orthodox service speaks something to our microwave oven, do-it-my-way, overly-casual culture.
Munkee said…
Seraphim, pretty much my sentiments exactly...there doesn't seem to be a single comment in conflict on here.

James, how much do i have to pay to get you to dance with might before me???
Anonymous said…
Met. Anthony said he loved dancing. I don't think (having been to his liturgy 20 years ago) he was likely to suggest it happen at the London Cathedral. Remember the old, old idea that you can pray while you brush your teeth, but shouldn't brush your teeth in church.
I was reminded by some comments of a conversation 23 years ago outside an Episcopal Church I attended in Albuquerque. There was some odd "procession" about to occur, and I asked why it was done. It was said to be a new idea. Did they do this last year, I asked? No, was the answer, "It's our tradition to never do the same thing twice". Really. I thought of asking just how that might be different from having *No* tradition whatever, but thought it was a little futile. THe little sashay done in this video will be gone soon enough, replaced by heaven knows what, because the folks at that parish don't know yet either. But gone it will be. Theres a great line from a Byzantine Catholic writer on the sacraments in the early Church. He was explaining how Christians changed rites and how pagans changed theirs. The Christians changed things he said, to better express their unchanging beliefs, while pagans changed their rites as often as the beliefs changed. A big idea. If you have to rewrite the weekly service that often, maybe more than the service is drifting. I never get tired of a liturgy that doesn't change. It isn't broken and needn't be fixed. --- Bob Koch
fdj said…
Seraphim...nope I don't think there was disagreement. I'm just pushing to help in develop an apologetic for NOT dancing during the Little Entrance.

Aaron...how much to dance? Hmmmm...will there be cameras? But seriously, I sat down and read the account in 2nd Samuel of David's dance and it floored me too! Think about if you had just watched someone get struck down dead for touching the ark for trying to keep it from falling (labelled as "irreverance"). Then would you you have the nerve to dance around it?

Not me. I'd say: "Tell ya what fellas, you carry it in and I'll watch quietly from a safe distance." No thanks...you let these folks do the dancing (like St. Xenia and St. David and the folks in the video), as for me....I'm a little too scared.
Anonymous said…
In addition to *not* dancing (and who knows what it might have looked like?) in the Orthodox Liturgy, in most places the service doesn't allow for the congregation to exchange "The Peace". I know there are a few, but I have never got used to it. There are some things that died out in liturgies for really very good reasons. If you came from a place like the Episcopal Church, you might have seen what a disaster took place around 35 years ago when the "Peace" was thrown into their already declining liturgical life. The service came to a complete halt, almost anything would happen, and did. Some time later, the worship could resume. The Orthodox congregations that have this are not far behind, in my experience. Some things get dropped that used to be in liturgies, and it ain't no loss. The way moderns misuse such elements of worship probably looks like the reason they were dropped hundreds of years ago.
When someone points out how Ethiopians or Copts or Assyrians liturgize, well, if you hadn't noticed, there are precious few Orthodox Yankees who have anything remotely able to be mistaken for any of those cultures. Their history is *not* ours, and if you want to look like the video we've been cackling at, just go ahead and get Ethiopian for a day. All the good taste of a Minstrel Show Liturgy. The Little Entrance may look a little odd as it's done now; entering something by means of starting inside and going out to go in again...It does have something most modern liturgies lack, which is a shred of dignity.
--- Bob Koch

Popular Posts