What is paradosis? | bloghome | paradosis website | contact

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

[The Creation of the Chicken]

An unworthy Deacon, named for the brother of God: James, striving to "work out his salvation with fear and trembling" within the Tradition (paradosis) of the Eastern Orthodox Faith. It is a strange and marvelous journey, and I am accompanied by the fourfold fruit of my fecundity. My wife, the Matushka or Diaconissa Sophia, is my beloved partner in the pursuit of Theosis, and she ranks me in every way.
<
[Consider Supporting]
[Our Farm]
[The Past]
05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002
06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002
07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002
08/01/2002 - 09/01/2002
09/01/2002 - 10/01/2002
10/01/2002 - 11/01/2002
11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002
12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003
01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003
02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003
03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003
04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003
08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009
04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009
05/01/2009 - 06/01/2009
06/01/2009 - 07/01/2009
07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009
08/01/2009 - 09/01/2009
09/01/2009 - 10/01/2009
10/01/2009 - 11/01/2009
11/01/2009 - 12/01/2009
12/01/2009 - 01/01/2010
01/01/2010 - 02/01/2010
02/01/2010 - 03/01/2010
03/01/2010 - 04/01/2010
04/01/2010 - 05/01/2010
05/01/2010 - 06/01/2010
08/01/2010 - 09/01/2010
09/01/2010 - 10/01/2010
10/01/2010 - 11/01/2010
03/01/2011 - 04/01/2011
04/01/2011 - 05/01/2011
05/01/2011 - 06/01/2011
06/01/2011 - 07/01/2011
10/01/2011 - 11/01/2011
11/01/2011 - 12/01/2011
12/01/2011 - 01/01/2012
02/01/2012 - 03/01/2012
03/01/2012 - 04/01/2012
04/01/2012 - 05/01/2012
05/01/2012 - 06/01/2012
06/01/2012 - 07/01/2012
08/01/2012 - 09/01/2012
02/01/2013 - 03/01/2013
04/01/2013 - 05/01/2013
07/01/2013 - 08/01/2013
11/01/2013 - 12/01/2013
02/01/2014 - 03/01/2014
03/01/2014 - 04/01/2014
07/01/2014 - 08/01/2014
[Orthodox America]
Antiochian Archdiocese
Greek Orthodox Archdiocese
Orthodox Church in America
Serbian Orthodox Church in America
Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Church in America
[monasteries]
Valaam
Holy Myrrhbearers
Saint John
Saint Theodore
New Skete
Saint Herman
Saint Anthony, AZ
Balamand Monastery
[mercy]
Zoe for Life
In Communion
IOCC
Missions
[orthodox bloggers]
Notes from a Hillside Farm
Bishop Seraphim
This is Life
Fly in the Holy Oil
The Violent Munkee
The Blue Canopy
Sophia Says
Notes from a common place book
Pithless Thoughts
Photios
[I am a Rusyn]
[Slovakia]
[Kosovo]
[Mmmmmm]
[Where in the World?]
Locations of visitors to this page

Thursday, October 11, 2007

When lack of preferential treatment becomes rejection of all

In other words: When "separation of Church and State" or "separation of religion and science" become, quite simply, default atheism.

At least the Soviets were forthright about it.

Really, this is just a small indicator story. And it is rather ironic that our money mentions God and that our congress prays before opening their sessions...though I suspect these are well on their way to being eradicated.

I've long noted here my concerns about our society growing more and more in the direction of default atheism and I do believe to a large degree that we have ceded too much ground on this issue. Frustrated by all the lawsuits I think our schools and our public institutions have essentially embraced atheism, without actually saying so. It's just the path of least resistance because to a large degree we have not really recognized atheism as a religion yet...as I said, it is the default position. Yes, the starting place from which we begin: everything must be understood and explained as if God did not exist. Some have tried and tell me that it's more like default agnosticism, but I disagree. We are not allowed to even talk about religion and that's essentially atheism.

Consider science education today. We live in a world that is ridden with science, it is absolutely everywhere and indeed we have become a people who demand reasoned arguments, evidence, data, studies, thoughts from people with lots of letters behind their names, scientific consensus etc in just about everything we might consider in life. Of course, as one who generally employs such methodology as a means of employment, I recognize the virtues here. But I've also recognized the shortcomings as well.

Unfortunately (perhaps), we've all too often applied the same methodology for determining the nature of reality to "higher" things: like love, like joy, like honor, like altruism, like prayer, like God Himself. Most everyday we can find a media covered version of a study that shows - based primarily of genocentric understandings of human evolution - why we "feel" love or or why we sense "joy" or why we sense "awe" or why live-in couples share workloads better than married ones.

On what basis can we tell science that there is a boundary they ought not to cross? We have certainly obeyed the boundary fence they have put up, right? We do not dare to bring God into discussions of evolution, diseases, origins, physics, or chemistry. Notions of Intelligent Design are really nothing but religion disguised as science (so we are told) and so we obediently agree, walk away, and admit that God is something beyond science, something personal and that while we believe he is ultimately responsible God just didn't really leave much evidence of this for us. More and more in executing such retreats we surrender our kids to be taught that they are essentially their genes...little machines to assist the replicators (DNA)in their eons long fight for survival of the fittest...one big part of the mammalian family, really not all that different than Chimpanzees. These ideas have pretty profound implications whether we admit it or not and kids are not stupid so that even if they are not taught so overtly I believe they'll recognize them. I worry they have already to a large degree and are really having a hard time processing the logic of the one with the fuzzy logic of politically correct diversity training and "can't we all get along?" Well, is it survival of the fittest or not? If not, why not? Can we step up at that point? Maybe.

But, on what basis could we argue that such implications need not be made if we have utterly ceded the playing field to begin with? What boundary can science NOT cross...and more importantly WHY not? What can science NOT tell us about ourselves? And we have to keep in mind that just because we believe there is indeed such a boundary we had better be damned prepared to say where it is and why it is there because very likely science is already jumped it, having failed to understand how we can object to their noble quest of dissecting reality.

We have to also keep in mind we live in an age that for the most part sees the scientific method as THE means of perceiving reality. What are we to say about humankind then? That we are MORE than what can be discerned by rational and objective inquiry? Can you hear the laughing already? I can and I have and I understand it. If the Vesperal prayer is right and we ARE a "rational flock" then MUST we use seemingly irrational arguments to express our notion of "reality"?

Perhaps we HOPE our kids we be taught some sense of human dignity in Literature class? Perhaps we will rely on the Church or our own powerful means of influence we have on the intellectual processes of our teenagers? I would suggest we face as lofty a wall to scale in teaching our kids to wait until marriage in today's sexed crazed culture as we do teaching our kids that humans are made in the Image and Likeness of God in today's Genetic crazed neo-Darwinism crazed culture. Whether you accept the theory of evolution as popularly presented today wholesale or whether you have some toned down notions of it or whether you are a young earth creationist, you are going to have to address this issue. In our society where default atheism, there is no "maker of heaven and earth...of all things seen and unseen."

Ideas have meaning and we ought to be concerned with the ideas that are readily being extrapolated from science today. Our public policy is already bent toward encouraging them.


And let me put forth one more thought: is it any wonder that gnosticism has grown so much in popularity today - even without its adherents knowing it? By this I mean the sense of separation between the physical and the spiritual world: the flesh (all that which can be understood by science) is forever separated from the spirit (all that which can be understood by religion). Is the prevailing sense of this separation (church and state, science and religion) perhaps a root cause for its new spilling over into Christianity? Have we given up the material world as being God's? I wonder, seriously. Must we resort to post-modern revisionist and relativistic notions of truth and reality to discern that we are indeed more than our genes? I personally do not believe so.

If matter matters to God, as we know it does (e.g. you and me and the Incarnation) then should we really be respecting science's anti-religious boundary as strictly as they insist?

...offered by Dn. James Ferrenberg, a sinner at 7:24 AM [+]
+++
0 comments


0 Comments:

Post a Comment




This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?