Orthodox Christian Sensitivity Training in public schools

No surprise these days what the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals does, but really, THIS from the court that wants "under God" removed from the pledge? I might suggest if this is being done in public schools in order to increase cultural awareness, that they do the same for eastern European, Greek, African and Middle Eastern immigrants who are Orthdoox. (Key in particularly on those who have more melanin, because...well...that will earn you some extra points.)

Here's my plan as compared to the current one in California:

California's 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it's OK to put public-school kids through Muslim role-playing exercises, including:

And of course, afterwards we will be having Orthodox Christian Role Playing!

Reciting aloud Muslim prayers that begin with "In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful . . . ."

Cool, and in our course they will recite prayers like: “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. O heavenly King, the Comforter…”

Memorizing the Muslim profession of faith: "Allah is the only true God and Muhammad is his messenger."

Awesome, so in our course the kids will learn the Orthodox Symbol of Faith: “I believe in one God, the Father Almighty…”

Chanting "Praise be to Allah" in response to teacher prompts.

Yes! And in our course they will learn the various seasonal proclamations and responses, such as: “Christ is Risen! Indeed He is Risen!”

Professing as "true" the Muslim belief that "The Holy Quran is God's word."

And in our course, the children will go through the renunciations and affirmations offered during Chrismantion...though we'll only actually Chrismate those who get a permission slip signed by their parent(s), or parent/partner.

Giving up candy and TV to demonstrate Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of fasting.

Say goodbye to meat and dairy in our course, kids!

Designing prayer rugs, taking an Arabic name and essentially "becoming a Muslim" for two full weeks.

Right on! In our course the kids will learn to make prayer ropes, take on some cool Orthodox names like “Seraphim(a)” or “Ephrem(ia)” and essentially becoming Orthodox for two full weeks. The last couple of days we will include an intense sensitivity training program in which some of the students will assume the role of either atheistic Communist government authorites or Islamic Turkish oppressors who will arrest/persecute/martyr the Orthodox Christians and turn their churches either into Mosques or Museums. We might also try hauling off the kids' pets to be indoctrinated and made killing machines in an enemy army.

Of course the 9th Circuit Court would see the term "Christian", and the ACLU lawyer could show up drunk and naked and still get it shot down.

Comments

fdj said…
Robert Spencer claims he testified in the case.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/011530.php

Original court decision:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/12/12/MNGBN3L90R10.DTL

More recent:
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/%5Cnews.aspx?id=15960

It's truly amazing.
Hilarius said…
The official citation (but it's an unpublished opinion of the 9th Cir. per their rules) is:

Eklund v. Byron Union Sch. Dist., 154 Fed Appx 648 (9th Cir. 2005) (2005 WL 3086580)
Anonymous said…
Still not a lot out there on the case itself. I'm skeptical about the interpretation of the decision advanced thus far because of a discussion I had w/ a lawyer friend about he famous McDonalds hot coffee case.

At the time the plaintiff was the subject of much derision because of the presumed (frivlous)nature of the complaint. The common wisdom was that Ronald go handed a raw deal and that these sorts of lawsuits were out of hand. Come to find out that the plaintiff presented documentary evidence showing that 1) Ron et. al. had been warned of the burn danger, 2) calculated that they'd sell a lot more coffee if it was really hot 3) elected to accept the risk of a suit in return for the extra profits they would make on the extra hot coffee.

Things aren't always what they seem and while I'm deeply suspicious of the 9th court and deplore the double standard which creates 'culture' out of other religions but not my own, I do note that one of the three reasons the case was thrown out was the the suit was brought because of somethig that MIGHT happen, not something that did happen. There may be more to this than meets the eye. Now to dig up the actual decision.


sf
fdj said…
The legality of the issue is of much lessor importance to me. The fact that this would NEVER happen - least of all on the 9th Circuit Court's watch if it were a course on anything remotely involving Christianity.

I'm not sure they would seen things the same way if somone MIGHT, but didn't get Chrismated in my fictional course.

Popular Posts